1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 vs Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM
The short answer
Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM wins this comparison with a score of 78/100, ahead of 1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 (75).
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| 1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 | Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise | 57 | 63 |
| Efficiency | 98 | 96 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier4Pro
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier5S
IQAir Atem X
airpal VB110 V-B110
KJ100G-A01 KJ100G-A01
LEXY AP33
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Noise1▾
| 1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 | Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise level | — | 32 dB |
Efficiency1▾
| 1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 | Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | — | 80 W |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, 1.0 1.0 KJ380G-A03 or Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM?
Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM has the higher overall score (78 vs 75).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 2 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.