荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB vs Apple Apple iPhone 18
The short answer
荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB wins this comparison with a score of 36/100, ahead of Apple Apple iPhone 18 (30).
Scores are computed from 11 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 30 | 25 |
| Battery | 24 | 22 |
| Performance | 37 | 37 |
| Design | 75 | 73 |
| Features | 96 | 50 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Display type | AMOLED | — |
Battery2▾
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | — |
Performance1▾
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| OS | MagicOS 7.2 | — |
Design4▾
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | — |
| Length | 161 mm | — |
| Width | 74.2 mm | — |
| Colors | GT蓝，燃速金，星曜黑 查看外观 | — |
Features1▾
| 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB | Apple Apple iPhone 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, 荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB or Apple Apple iPhone 18?
荣耀90 荣耀90 GT 24GB/1TB has the higher overall score (36 vs 30).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 11 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 11 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.