AOC AG322FCX vs AOC AGON AG275UXM2
The short answer
AOC AGON AG275UXM2 wins this comparison with a score of 58/100, ahead of AOC AG322FCX (57).
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 3840x2160) · Max refresh rate (144 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| AOC AG322FCX | AOC AGON AG275UXM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 41 | 39 |
| Ergonomics | 83 | 88 |
How to choose
Pick the AOC AG322FCX if you care about…
- Screen size 31.5 in +4.5 in vs 27 in
Pick the AOC AGON AG275UXM2 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 160 Hz +16 Hz vs 144 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| AOC AG322FCX | AOC AGON AG275UXM2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 27 in | AOC AG322FCX |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 144 Hz | 160 Hz | AOC AGON AG275UXM2 |
| Panel type | VA | Fast-IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| AOC AG322FCX | AOC AGON AG275UXM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 144 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Panel type | VA | Fast-IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| AOC AG322FCX | AOC AGON AG275UXM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 9000 g | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, AOC AG322FCX or AOC AGON AG275UXM2?
AOC AGON AG275UXM2 edges ahead 58 to 57. Choose AOC AG322FCX instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 3840x2160) · Max refresh rate (144 Hz vs 160 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.