AOC Q27G4SL/WS vs AOC Q27G51F
AOC Q27G4SL/WS — Pick the AOC Q27G4SL/WS — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
AOC Q27G4SL/WS wins this comparison with a score of 60/100, ahead of AOC Q27G51F (58).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (300 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs IPS) · Weight (with stand) (3360 g vs 3230 g).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| AOC Q27G4SL/WS | AOC Q27G51F | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 47 | 38 |
| Ergonomics | 89 | 89 |
How to choose
Pick the AOC Q27G4SL/WS if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 300 Hz +156 Hz vs 144 Hz
Pick the AOC Q27G51F if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 3230 g +130 g vs 3360 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| AOC Q27G4SL/WS | AOC Q27G51F | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 300 Hz | 144 Hz | AOC Q27G4SL/WS |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 3360 g | 3230 g | AOC Q27G51F |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| AOC Q27G4SL/WS | AOC Q27G51F | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 300 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| AOC Q27G4SL/WS | AOC Q27G51F | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3360 g | 3230 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, AOC Q27G4SL/WS or AOC Q27G51F?
AOC Q27G4SL/WS edges ahead 60 to 58 and leads in Display. Choose AOC Q27G51F instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (300 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs IPS) · Weight (with stand) (3360 g vs 3230 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.