EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 16

🏆 Settled

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max — Pick the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max — it leads these groups: Display 1 Performance 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max wins this comparison with a score of 32/100, ahead of Apple iPhone 16 (31).

The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Display type (LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED vs Super Retina XDR OLED) · Battery capacity (4441 mAh vs 3561 mAh).

Scores are computed from 27 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Apple
32score / 100
3 wins · 19 tied
Apple iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16

Apple
31score / 100
5 wins · 17 tied PCMag ★ 4.5

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Display 35 33
Battery 33 33
Performance 48 36
Camera 19 19
Design 64 77
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.7 in +0.6 in vs 6.1 in
  • Battery capacity 4441 mAh +880 mAh vs 3561 mAh
  • Storage 256 GB +128 GB vs 128 GB

Pick the Apple iPhone 16 if you care about…

  • Wireless charging power 25 W +10 W vs 15 W
  • Weight 170 g +51 g vs 221 g
  • Thickness 7.8 mm +0.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Length 147.6 mm +12.3 mm vs 159.9 mm

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16Where they differ
Screen size 6.7 in6.1 in Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Display type LTPO Super Retina XDR OLEDSuper Retina XDR OLED Depends
Battery capacity 4441 mAh3561 mAh Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Wireless charging power 15 W25 W Apple iPhone 16
Chipset Apple A17 ProApple A18 Depends
OS iOS 17iOS 18 Depends
Storage 256 GB128 GB Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Weight 221 g170 g Apple iPhone 16
Thickness 8.3 mm7.8 mm Apple iPhone 16
Length 159.9 mm147.6 mm Apple iPhone 16
Width 76.7 mm71.6 mm Apple iPhone 16
Colors Black Titanium, White Titanium, Blue Titanium, Natural TitaniumBlack, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Screen size 6.7 in 6.1 in
Peak brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Pixel density 460 ppi 460 ppi
Display type LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED Super Retina XDR OLED
Battery4▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Battery capacity 4441 mAh 3561 mAh
Wired charging 27 W —
Wireless charging power 15 W 25 W
Wireless charging ✓ ✓
Performance5▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
RAM 8 GB 8 GB
Chipset Apple A17 Pro Apple A18
OS iOS 17 iOS 18
Storage 256 GB 128 GB
AnTuTu 11 score — 1985600
Camera2▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Main camera 48 MP 48 MP
Selfie camera 12 MP 12 MP
Design7▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Weight 221 g 170 g
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.8 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ ✓
Length 159.9 mm 147.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 71.6 mm
Colors Black Titanium, White Titanium, Blue Titanium, Natural Titanium Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine
Body material 钛金属设计,超瓷晶面板,亚光质感玻璃背板 —
Memory1▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
CPU cores 6 6
Features2▾
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple iPhone 16
Face unlock ✓ ✓
Fingerprint sensor — —

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max or Apple iPhone 16?

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max edges ahead 32 to 31 and leads in Display, Performance. Choose Apple iPhone 16 instead if Wireless charging power matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Display type (LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED vs Super Retina XDR OLED) · Battery capacity (4441 mAh vs 3561 mAh).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 27 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.