Arlo Go 2 Cameras vs Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera
The short answer
Arlo Go 2 Cameras wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera (43).
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Arlo Go 2 Cameras | Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 51 | 50 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony ZV-E1
Fujifilm X-T5
Nikon Z6III
Sony A7C II
Sony A7 IV
Canon EOS R50
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Sensor1▾
| Arlo Go 2 Cameras | Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | — | 4 MP |
Details1▾
| Arlo Go 2 Cameras | Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof | Water Resistant | Water Resistant |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, Arlo Go 2 Cameras or Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera?
Arlo Go 2 Cameras edges ahead 44 to 43.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 2 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.