EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Aya Neo Flip DS vs Aya Neo Flip KB

🏆 Settled

Aya Neo Flip DS — Pick the Aya Neo Flip DS — it leads these groups: Performance 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Aya Neo Flip DS wins this comparison with a score of 78/100, ahead of Aya Neo Flip KB (77).

The main differences: Memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 67.2 GB/s).

Scores are computed from 9 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Aya Neo Flip DS

Aya Neo Flip DS

Aya
78score / 100
1 win · 8 tied
Aya Neo Flip KB

Aya Neo Flip KB

Aya
77score / 100
0 wins · 9 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KB
Performance 43 40
Memory 100 100
Display 71 71
Features 100 100

How to choose

Pick the Aya Neo Flip DS if you care about…

  • Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s +35.2 GB/s vs 67.2 GB/s

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KBWhere they differ
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s67.2 GB/s Aya Neo Flip DS

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance5▾
Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KB
CPU cores 8 8
Base clock 3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
GPU performance 4.1 TFLOPS 4.1 TFLOPS
Shader units 768 768
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 67.2 GB/s
Memory1▾
Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KB
RAM 64 GB 64 GB
Display1▾
Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KB
Output refresh 120 Hz 120 Hz
Features2▾
Aya Neo Flip DSAya Neo Flip KB
Ray tracing ✓ ✓
NVMe storage ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Aya Neo Flip DS or Aya Neo Flip KB?

Aya Neo Flip DS edges ahead 78 to 77 and leads in Performance.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 67.2 GB/s).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 9 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.