B.FRIENDit K23 vs BLADE BLADE

🏆 Settled

B.FRIENDit K23 — Pick the B.FRIENDit K23 — it leads these groups: Connect ¹

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

B.FRIENDit K23 wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of BLADE BLADE (56).

The main differences: Key count (22 vs 92) · 2.4GHz wireless (✓ vs —).

Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner

B.FRIENDit K23

B.FRIENDit

68score / 100

1 win · 1 tie ZOL Users ★ 4.5 (6)

BLADE BLADE

迪摩贪狼BLADE刀锋机械键盘

56score / 100

1 win · 1 tie

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

	B.FRIENDit K23	BLADE BLADE
Design	60	70
Connect	87	32

How to choose

Pick the B.FRIENDit K23 if you care about…

2.4GHz wireless ✓ vs —

Pick the BLADE BLADE if you care about…

Key count 92 +70 vs 22

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Logitech MX Keys S

Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro

Aula F99

MCHOSE G75 Pro

Lofree -68

Aula S75Pro-V2

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

	B.FRIENDit K23	BLADE BLADE	Where they differ
Key count	22	92	BLADE BLADE
2.4GHz wireless	✓	—	B.FRIENDit K23

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design2▾

	B.FRIENDit K23	BLADE BLADE
Layout	—	暂无数据
Key count	22	92

Connect1▾

	B.FRIENDit K23	BLADE BLADE
2.4GHz wireless	✓	—

Feel1▾

	B.FRIENDit K23	BLADE BLADE
Switch type	—	机械轴（黑轴）

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, B.FRIENDit K23 or BLADE BLADE?

B.FRIENDit K23 has the higher overall score (68 vs 56) and leads in Connect. Choose BLADE BLADE instead if Key count matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Key count (22 vs 92) · 2.4GHz wireless (✓ vs —).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.