Beats Studio Pro vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 — Pick the Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 — it leads these groups: Audio 3 Connectivity 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of Beats Studio Pro (67).
The main differences: Weight (260 g vs 319 g) · Driver unit (40 mm vs 50 mm) · Lowest frequency (20 Hz vs 5 Hz).
Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 89 | 50 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 37 | 48 |
| Audio | 36 | 59 |
| Connectivity | 84 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the Beats Studio Pro if you care about…
- Weight 260 g +59 g vs 319 g
Pick the Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 if you care about…
- Driver unit 50 mm +10 mm vs 40 mm
- Lowest frequency 5 Hz +15 Hz vs 20 Hz
- Highest frequency 22000 Hz +2000 Hz vs 20000 Hz
- Bluetooth version 5.4 +0.1 vs 5.3
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2
Where they differ
5 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 260 g | 319 g | Beats Studio Pro |
| Driver unit | 40 mm | 50 mm | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | 22000 Hz | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 260 g | 319 g |
| Sweat/water resistance | ✓ | — |
| Foldable design | ✓ | ✓ |
Features2▾
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
Battery2▾
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 40 h | — |
| Charge time | 2 h | — |
Audio5▾
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | 40 mm | 50 mm |
| Impedance | — | 48 Ω |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | 22000 Hz |
| LDAC | — | — |
Connectivity2▾
| Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| USB-C charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Beats Studio Pro or Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 edges ahead 68 to 67 and leads in Audio, Connectivity. Choose Beats Studio Pro instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Weight (260 g vs 319 g) · Driver unit (40 mm vs 50 mm) · Lowest frequency (20 Hz vs 5 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 14 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.