EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Bose New Lifestyle Ultra Speaker vs Google Nest Audio

🏆 Settled

Google Nest Audio — Pick the Google Nest Audio — it leads these groups: Connectivity 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Google Nest Audio wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of Bose New Lifestyle Ultra Speaker (55).

The main differences: Bluetooth (— vs ✓).

Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Bose New Lifestyle Ultra Speaker

Bose New Lifestyle Ultra Speaker

Bose
55score / 100
0 wins · 4 tied
🏆 Overall winner Google Nest Audio

Google Nest Audio

Google
68score / 100
1 win · 3 tied PCMag ★ 4.0

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Bose New Lifestyle Ultra SpeakerGoogle Nest Audio
Connectivity 54 100
Value 75 75

How to choose

Pick the Google Nest Audio if you care about…

  • Bluetooth ✓ vs —

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Bose New Lifestyle Ultra SpeakerGoogle Nest AudioWhere they differ
Bluetooth —✓ Google Nest Audio

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Assistant2▾
Bose New Lifestyle Ultra SpeakerGoogle Nest Audio
Voice assistant — Google Assistant
Matter support — —
Connectivity2▾
Bose New Lifestyle Ultra SpeakerGoogle Nest Audio
Wi-Fi — ✓
Bluetooth — ✓
Value1▾
Bose New Lifestyle Ultra SpeakerGoogle Nest Audio
Price — 100 USD

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, Bose New Lifestyle Ultra Speaker or Google Nest Audio?

Google Nest Audio has the higher overall score (68 vs 55) and leads in Connectivity.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Bluetooth (— vs ✓).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.