United States Buffalo, NY vs United Kingdom Cambridge
United States Buffalo, NY — Pick the United States Buffalo, NY — it leads these groups: Economy 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
United States Buffalo, NY wins this comparison with a score of 59/100, ahead of United Kingdom Cambridge (58).
The main differences: GDP per capita (country) (82587 USD vs 49920 USD) · Cost of living index (74.7 vs 74.3) · Rent index (31.9 vs 43.6).
Scores are computed from 17 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Economy | 53 | 44 |
| Cost of living | 79 | 80 |
| Climate | 44 | 44 |
| People & place | 34 | 33 |
How to choose
Pick the United States Buffalo, NY if you care about…
- GDP per capita (country) 82587 USD +32667 USD vs 49920 USD
- Rent index 31.9 +11.7 vs 43.6
- Cost + rent index 55.1 +5.2 vs 60.3
- Summer average 22.4 °C +3.8 °C vs 18.6 °C
Pick the United Kingdom Cambridge if you care about…
- Cost of living index 74.3 +0.4 vs 74.7
- Groceries index 67.6 +10.4 vs 78
- Restaurant price index 76.1 +3.6 vs 79.7
- Local purchasing power 132.7 +12.6 vs 120.1
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Norway Oslo
Israel Jerusalem
Switzerland Bern
Switzerland Basel
Switzerland Zurich
Singapore Singapore
Where they differ
13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDP per capita (country) | 82587 USD | 49920 USD | United States Buffalo, NY |
| Cost of living index | 74.7 | 74.3 | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Rent index | 31.9 | 43.6 | United States Buffalo, NY |
| Cost + rent index | 55.1 | 60.3 | United States Buffalo, NY |
| Groceries index | 78 | 67.6 | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Restaurant price index | 79.7 | 76.1 | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Local purchasing power | 120.1 | 132.7 | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Average temperature | 11 °C | 11.4 °C | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Summer average | 22.4 °C | 18.6 °C | United States Buffalo, NY |
| Winter average | -1.2 °C | 4.8 °C | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Annual precipitation | 1264 mm | 851 mm | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Rain days per year | 163 days | 139 days | United Kingdom Cambridge |
| Sunshine hours per year | 2975 h | 2646 h | United States Buffalo, NY |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Economy2▾
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | 0.1 M |
| GDP per capita (country) | 82587 USD | 49920 USD |
Cost of living6▾
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living index | 74.7 | 74.3 |
| Rent index | 31.9 | 43.6 |
| Cost + rent index | 55.1 | 60.3 |
| Groceries index | 78 | 67.6 |
| Restaurant price index | 79.7 | 76.1 |
| Local purchasing power | 120.1 | 132.7 |
Climate6▾
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Average temperature | 11 °C | 11.4 °C |
| Summer average | 22.4 °C | 18.6 °C |
| Winter average | -1.2 °C | 4.8 °C |
| Annual precipitation | 1264 mm | 851 mm |
| Rain days per year | 163 days | 139 days |
| Sunshine hours per year | 2975 h | 2646 h |
People & place3▾
| United States Buffalo, NY | United Kingdom Cambridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Population density | — | 3043 /km² |
| Area | — | 41 km² |
| Elevation | — | 6 m |
Data sources: Numbeo · Open-Meteo · Wikidata · World Bank
FAQ
Which is better, United States Buffalo, NY or United Kingdom Cambridge?
United States Buffalo, NY edges ahead 59 to 58 and leads in Economy. Choose United Kingdom Cambridge instead if Cost of living index matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: GDP per capita (country) (82587 USD vs 49920 USD) · Cost of living index (74.7 vs 74.3) · Rent index (31.9 vs 43.6).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 17 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.