Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 vs Kingston 16GB DDR4 2400
The short answer
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 wins this comparison with a score of 52/100, ahead of Kingston 16GB DDR4 2400 (48).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Samsung 2×8GB DDR4 3200
ADATA 16GB DDR3 2400
Corsair 16GB DDR3 1600 CMD16GX3M2A1600C9
Corsair 16GB DDR4 3600 CM4X16GC3600C18K2D-CN
Corsair 16GB DDR5 5200
ADATA XPG D500G DDR5 7200 64GB 32GBx2
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Speed2▾
| Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 | Kingston 16GB DDR4 2400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory speed | 6200 MT/s | — |
| CAS latency | 36 | — |
Specs2▾
| Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 | Kingston 16GB DDR4 2400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Module size | 16 GB | — |
| Voltage | 1.3 V | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 or Kingston 16GB DDR4 2400?
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6200 C36 has the higher overall score (52 vs 48).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.