EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice vs NY CUNY New York City College of Technology

🏆 Settled

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice — Pick the NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice wins this comparison with a score of 43/100, ahead of NY CUNY New York City College of Technology (42).

The main differences: Acceptance rate (57.1 % vs 80.3 %) · Average SAT (1080 vs 1010) · In-state tuition (7470 USD/yr vs 7332 USD/yr).

Scores are computed from 11 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice

NY
43score / 100
5 wins · 4 tied

NY CUNY New York City College of Technology

NY
42score / 100
4 wins · 5 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Admissions 49 54
Cost & outcomes 55 45
Students & campus 7 8

How to choose

Pick the NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice if you care about…

  • Average SAT 1080 +70 vs 1010
  • Median earnings (10 yr) 56195 USD +6830 USD vs 49365 USD
  • Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 73.6 % +5.2 % vs 68.4 %
  • Graduation rate (150%) 55.8 % +34.4 % vs 21.5 %

Pick the NY CUNY New York City College of Technology if you care about…

  • Acceptance rate 80.3 % +23.2 % vs 57.1 %
  • In-state tuition 7332 USD/yr +138 USD/yr vs 7470 USD/yr
  • Out-of-state tuition 15282 USD/yr +138 USD/yr vs 15420 USD/yr
  • Undergraduate students 13580 +1990 vs 11590

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNY CUNY New York City College of TechnologyWhere they differ
Acceptance rate 57.1 %80.3 % NY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Average SAT 10801010 NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice
In-state tuition 7470 USD/yr7332 USD/yr NY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Out-of-state tuition 15420 USD/yr15282 USD/yr NY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Median earnings (10 yr) 56195 USD49365 USD NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 73.6 %68.4 % NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Graduation rate (150%) 55.8 %21.5 % NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Freshman retention 81.6 %64.9 % NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Undergraduate students 1159013580 NY CUNY New York City College of Technology

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Admissions2▾
NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Acceptance rate 57.1 % 80.3 %
Average SAT 1080 1010
Cost & outcomes6▾
NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNY CUNY New York City College of Technology
In-state tuition 7470 USD/yr 7332 USD/yr
Out-of-state tuition 15420 USD/yr 15282 USD/yr
Median earnings (10 yr) 56195 USD 49365 USD
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 73.6 % 68.4 %
Graduation rate (150%) 55.8 % 21.5 %
Freshman retention 81.6 % 64.9 %
Students & campus3▾
NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNY CUNY New York City College of Technology
Undergraduate students 11590 13580
Campus setting City City
Ownership Public Public

Data sources: College Scorecard

FAQ

Which is better, NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice or NY CUNY New York City College of Technology?

NY CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice edges ahead 43 to 42 and leads in Cost & outcomes. Choose NY CUNY New York City College of Technology instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Acceptance rate (57.1 % vs 80.3 %) · Average SAT (1080 vs 1010) · In-state tuition (7470 USD/yr vs 7332 USD/yr).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 11 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.