DJI Air 3S vs DJI Avata
DJI Air 3S — Pick the DJI Air 3S — it leads these groups: Camera 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
DJI Air 3S wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of DJI Avata (56).
The main differences: Weight (724 g vs 377 g) · Camera resolution (48 MP vs 12 MP) · Max video (4K120 vs 4K).
Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the DJI Air 3S if you care about…
- Camera resolution 48 MP +36 MP vs 12 MP
Pick the DJI Avata if you care about…
- Weight 377 g +347 g vs 724 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
DJI Mini 3
DJI Air 3
DJI Neo
DJI Mini 4 Pro
DJI Avata 2
DJI Mavic 4 Pro
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| DJI Air 3S | DJI Avata | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 724 g | 377 g | DJI Avata |
| Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | DJI Air 3S |
| Max video | 4K120 | 4K | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design1▾
| DJI Air 3S | DJI Avata | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 724 g | 377 g |
Flight3▾
| DJI Air 3S | DJI Avata | |
|---|---|---|
| Max flight time | 45 min | — |
| Omnidirectional obstacle sensing | ✓ | — |
| Transmission range | 20 km | — |
Camera2▾
| DJI Air 3S | DJI Avata | |
|---|---|---|
| Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Max video | 4K120 | 4K |
Value1▾
| DJI Air 3S | DJI Avata | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 999 USD | — |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, DJI Air 3S or DJI Avata?
DJI Air 3S has the higher overall score (68 vs 56) and leads in Camera. Choose DJI Avata instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Weight (724 g vs 377 g) · Camera resolution (48 MP vs 12 MP) · Max video (4K120 vs 4K).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.