EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station vs EcoFlow River 3
The short answer
EcoFlow River 3 wins this comparison with a score of 42/100, ahead of EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station (37).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Bluetti AC180
Jackery Explorer 300 Plus
Jackery Explorer 1000 v2
EcoFlow Delta 3
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker SOLIX C1000
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Power3▾
| EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station | EcoFlow River 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | — | 245 Wh |
| Max output | — | 370 W |
| AC outlets | — | 5 |
Charging1▾
| EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station | EcoFlow River 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Solar input | — | 220 W |
Design1▾
| EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station | EcoFlow River 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 3300 g |
Value1▾
| EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station | EcoFlow River 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | 329 USD |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, EcoFlow RIVER 2 Portable Power Station or EcoFlow River 3?
EcoFlow River 3 has the higher overall score (42 vs 37).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.