Edifier W830NB vs Epos Impact 1000
The short answer
Edifier W830NB wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of Epos Impact 1000 (66).
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 56 | 43 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 48 | 49 |
| Audio | 59 | 56 |
| Connectivity | 84 | 84 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 170 g |
| Sweat/water resistance | — | — |
| Foldable design | — | — |
Features2▾
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | — | ✓ |
| Built-in microphone | — | ✓ |
Battery2▾
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 55 h |
| Charge time | — | 1.5 h |
Audio5▾
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | — | 36 mm |
| Impedance | — | 20 Ω |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20000 Hz |
| LDAC | — | ✓ |
Connectivity3▾
| Edifier W830NB | Epos Impact 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Multipoint connection | — | ✓ |
| USB-C charging | — | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Edifier W830NB or Epos Impact 1000?
Edifier W830NB edges ahead 68 to 66.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 15 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.