EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 vs Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa
The short answer
EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 wins this comparison with a score of 63/100, ahead of Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa (55).
Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 | Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa | |
|---|---|---|
| Protection | 43 | 59 |
| Formula | 83 | 57 |
| Actives | 74 | 48 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Skin1004 Hyalu-Cica Water-Fit Sun Serum
Round Lab Birch Juice Moisturizing Sun Cream
Canmake Mermaid Skin Gel UV SPF50
ISDIN Fusion Water SPF50
Cosrx Aloe Soothing Sun Cream SPF50
Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch SPF50
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Protection2▾
| EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 | Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa | |
|---|---|---|
| SPF | 46 | — |
| UV filters | 0 | — |
Formula4▾
| EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 | Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient count | 17 | — |
| Star ingredients | 2 | — |
| Ingredients to avoid | 14 | — |
| Fragrance-free | ✓ | — |
Actives8▾
| EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 | Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa | |
|---|---|---|
| Niacinamide | ✓ | — |
| Hyaluronic acid | ✓ | — |
| Vitamin C | — | — |
| Ceramides | — | — |
| Retinoid | — | — |
| Salicylic acid | — | — |
| AHA exfoliants | ✓ | — |
| Clay | — | — |
Data sources: INCIDecoder
FAQ
Which is better, EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 or Black Bamboo Daily Soothing Sun Shield SPF50 Pa?
EltaMD UV Clear SPF46 has the higher overall score (63 vs 55).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 14 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 14 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.