FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach vs AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott
AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott — Pick the AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott wins this comparison with a score of 43/100, ahead of FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach (42).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (64.8 % vs 76.6 %) · Average SAT (1257 vs 1250) · In-state tuition (44249 USD/yr vs 44149 USD/yr).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 56 | 60 |
| Cost & outcomes | 47 | 47 |
| Students & campus | 5 | 2 |
How to choose
Pick the FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach if you care about…
- Average SAT 1257 +7 vs 1250
- Freshman retention 88.1 % +5.9 % vs 82.2 %
- Undergraduate students 7860 +4642 vs 3218
Pick the AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 76.6 % +11.8 % vs 64.8 %
- In-state tuition 44149 USD/yr +100 USD/yr vs 44249 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 44149 USD/yr +100 USD/yr vs 44249 USD/yr
- Graduation rate (150%) 67.8 % +1.2 % vs 66.5 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
7 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 64.8 % | 76.6 % | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott |
| Average SAT | 1257 | 1250 | FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach |
| In-state tuition | 44249 USD/yr | 44149 USD/yr | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott |
| Out-of-state tuition | 44249 USD/yr | 44149 USD/yr | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 66.5 % | 67.8 % | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott |
| Freshman retention | 88.1 % | 82.2 % | FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach |
| Undergraduate students | 7860 | 3218 | FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 64.8 % | 76.6 % |
| Average SAT | 1257 | 1250 |
| Average ACT | 26 | 26 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 44249 USD/yr | 44149 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 44249 USD/yr | 44149 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 84131 USD | 84131 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 85.4 % | 85.4 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 66.5 % | 67.8 % |
| Freshman retention | 88.1 % | 82.2 % |
Students & campus3▾
| FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach | AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 7860 | 3218 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Private nonprofit | Private nonprofit |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach or AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott?
AZ Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott edges ahead 43 to 42 and leads in Cost & outcomes. Choose FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach instead if Average SAT matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (64.8 % vs 76.6 %) · Average SAT (1257 vs 1250) · In-state tuition (44249 USD/yr vs 44149 USD/yr).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.