EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide vs GA Emory University

🏆 Settled

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide — Pick the FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide — it leads these groups: Students & campus 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide wins this comparison with a score of 42/100, ahead of GA Emory University (36).

The main differences: Acceptance rate (57.9 % vs 10.7 %) · Average SAT (1148 vs 1520) · In-state tuition (12097 USD/yr vs 64280 USD/yr).

Scores are computed from 16 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide

FL
42score / 100
5 wins · 9 tied

GA Emory University

GA
36score / 100
4 wins · 10 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory University
Admissions 53 61
Cost & outcomes 49 43
Rankings 48 27
Students & campus 6 4

How to choose

Pick the FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide if you care about…

  • Acceptance rate 57.9 % +47.3 % vs 10.7 %
  • In-state tuition 12097 USD/yr +52183 USD/yr vs 64280 USD/yr
  • Out-of-state tuition 12097 USD/yr +52183 USD/yr vs 64280 USD/yr
  • Median earnings (10 yr) 84131 USD +3994 USD vs 80137 USD

Pick the GA Emory University if you care about…

  • Average SAT 1520 +372 vs 1148
  • Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 87.9 % +2.5 % vs 85.4 %
  • Graduation rate (150%) 91.1 % +70.5 % vs 20.6 %
  • Freshman retention 95.7 % +35.4 % vs 60.3 %

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory UniversityWhere they differ
Acceptance rate 57.9 %10.7 % FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
Average SAT 11481520 GA Emory University
In-state tuition 12097 USD/yr64280 USD/yr FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
Out-of-state tuition 12097 USD/yr64280 USD/yr FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
Median earnings (10 yr) 84131 USD80137 USD FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.4 %87.9 % GA Emory University
Graduation rate (150%) 20.6 %91.1 % GA Emory University
Freshman retention 60.3 %95.7 % GA Emory University
Undergraduate students 91397298 FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Admissions3▾
FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory University
Acceptance rate 57.9 % 10.7 %
Average SAT 1148 1520
Average ACT — 33
Cost & outcomes6▾
FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory University
In-state tuition 12097 USD/yr 64280 USD/yr
Out-of-state tuition 12097 USD/yr 64280 USD/yr
Median earnings (10 yr) 84131 USD 80137 USD
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.4 % 87.9 %
Graduation rate (150%) 20.6 % 91.1 %
Freshman retention 60.3 % 95.7 %
Rankings4▾
FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory University
THE world rank — 102
THE overall score — 65.9
THE teaching — 53.8
THE research — 46.2
Students & campus3▾
FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-WorldwideGA Emory University
Undergraduate students 9139 7298
Campus setting City City
Ownership Private nonprofit Private nonprofit

Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education

FAQ

Which is better, FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide or GA Emory University?

FL Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide has the higher overall score (42 vs 36) and leads in Students & campus. Choose GA Emory University instead if Average SAT matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Acceptance rate (57.9 % vs 10.7 %) · Average SAT (1148 vs 1520) · In-state tuition (12097 USD/yr vs 64280 USD/yr).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 16 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.