EPOMAKER EK21 vs EPOMAKER G84
The short answer
EPOMAKER G84 wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of EPOMAKER EK21 (64).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| EPOMAKER EK21 | EPOMAKER G84 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 68 | 88 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| EPOMAKER EK21 | EPOMAKER G84 | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | — | ANSI (United States) |
| Hot-swappable | — | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | — | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 900 g |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER EK21 | EPOMAKER G84 | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | — | Epomaker Creamy Jade |
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER EK21 or EPOMAKER G84?
EPOMAKER G84 has the higher overall score (68 vs 64).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.