EPOMAKER G84 Pro vs EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite
EPOMAKER G84 Pro — Pick the EPOMAKER G84 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
EPOMAKER G84 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 67/100, ahead of EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite (66).
The main differences: Weight (970 g vs 1660 g) · Switch type (Epomaker Creamy Jade vs Feker Marble White Switch).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| EPOMAKER G84 Pro | EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 88 | 81 |
How to choose
Pick the EPOMAKER G84 Pro if you care about…
- Weight 970 g +690 g vs 1660 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| EPOMAKER G84 Pro | EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 970 g | 1660 g | EPOMAKER G84 Pro |
| Switch type | Epomaker Creamy Jade | Feker Marble White Switch | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| EPOMAKER G84 Pro | EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | ANSI (United States) | ANSI (United States) |
| Hot-swappable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 970 g | 1660 g |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER G84 Pro | EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | Epomaker Creamy Jade | Feker Marble White Switch |
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER G84 Pro or EPOMAKER Galaxy100 Lite?
EPOMAKER G84 Pro edges ahead 67 to 66 and leads in Design.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Weight (970 g vs 1660 g) · Switch type (Epomaker Creamy Jade vs Feker Marble White Switch).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.