EPOMAKER HE30 vs EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR
The short answer
EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of EPOMAKER HE30 (66).
The main differences: Layout (QWERTY vs ANSI (United States)) · Switch type (Magnetic Switch vs Epomaker Creamy Jade Magnetic).
Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| EPOMAKER HE30 | EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layout | QWERTY | ANSI (United States) | Depends |
| Switch type | Magnetic Switch | Epomaker Creamy Jade Magnetic | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design5▾
| EPOMAKER HE30 | EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | QWERTY | ANSI (United States) |
| Hot-swappable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key count | 29 | — |
| Weight | — | 745 g |
Connect1▾
| EPOMAKER HE30 | EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | ✓ | — |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER HE30 | EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | Magnetic Switch | Epomaker Creamy Jade Magnetic |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER HE30 or EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR?
EPOMAKER HE65 V2 TMR edges ahead 68 to 66.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Layout (QWERTY vs ANSI (United States)) · Switch type (Magnetic Switch vs Epomaker Creamy Jade Magnetic).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23