EPOMAKER LUMA100 vs EPOMAKER LUMA40
The short answer
EPOMAKER LUMA100 wins this comparison with a score of 68/100, ahead of EPOMAKER LUMA40 (64).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| EPOMAKER LUMA100 | EPOMAKER LUMA40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 91 | 69 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| EPOMAKER LUMA100 | EPOMAKER LUMA40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | ANSI (United States) | — |
| Hot-swappable | ✓ | — |
| Per-key RGB | ✓ | — |
| Weight | 620 g | — |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER LUMA100 | EPOMAKER LUMA40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | Epomaker Low Profile Mint | — |
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER LUMA100 or EPOMAKER LUMA40?
EPOMAKER LUMA100 has the higher overall score (68 vs 64).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.