EPOMAKER RT98 vs EPOMAKER Split 65
The short answer
EPOMAKER Split 65 wins this comparison with a score of 67/100, ahead of EPOMAKER RT98 (64).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| EPOMAKER RT98 | EPOMAKER Split 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | — | QWERTY |
| Hot-swappable | — | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | — | ✓ |
| Key count | — | 81 |
Connect1▾
| EPOMAKER RT98 | EPOMAKER Split 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER RT98 | EPOMAKER Split 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | — | Linear |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER RT98 or EPOMAKER Split 65?
EPOMAKER Split 65 has the higher overall score (67 vs 64).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.