EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max vs EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro
The short answer
EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max wins this comparison with a score of 67/100, ahead of EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro (60).
The main differences: Hot-swappable (✓ vs —) · Key count (97 vs 99).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max if you care about…
- Hot-swappable ✓ vs —
Pick the EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro if you care about…
- Key count 99 +2 vs 97
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hot-swappable | ✓ | — | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max |
| Key count | 97 | 99 | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | QWERTY | QWERTY |
| Hot-swappable | ✓ | — |
| Per-key RGB | ✓ | ✓ |
| Key count | 97 | 99 |
Connect1▾
| EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | ✓ | ✓ |
Feel1▾
| EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max | EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | Linear | Linear |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max or EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro?
EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Max has the higher overall score (67 vs 60). Choose EPOMAKER x AULA F99 Pro instead if Key count matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Hot-swappable (✓ vs —) · Key count (97 vs 99).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.