aigo SUPER vs Seasonic FOCUS GX-750
The short answer
aigo SUPER wins this comparison with a score of 43/100, ahead of Seasonic FOCUS GX-750 (41).
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Corsair HX1200i
Corsair HX1000i Shift
Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold
Cooler Master MWE Gold 850W - V3
Cooler Master MWE Gold 750W - V3
Cooler Master MWE 750 Bronze V3
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Power1▾
| aigo SUPER | Seasonic FOCUS GX-750 | |
|---|---|---|
| Output power | — | 750 W |
Value1▾
| aigo SUPER | Seasonic FOCUS GX-750 | |
|---|---|---|
| Warranty | — | 10 yr |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, aigo SUPER or Seasonic FOCUS GX-750?
aigo SUPER edges ahead 43 to 41.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 2 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.