G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g vs G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g
The short answer
G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g wins this comparison with a score of 56/100, ahead of G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g (50).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g
G-WolvesAt a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g | G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 62 |
| Design | 33 | 82 |
| Connect | 64 | 63 |
| Battery | 4 | 7 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Zowie EC2-CW
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance1▾
| G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g | G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | — | Optical |
Design1▾
| G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g | G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | — | 13 |
Connect1▾
| G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g | G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
Battery1▾
| G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g | G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 120 h |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, G-Wolves HTS ACE Wired Gaming Mouse ~45–48g or G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g?
G-Wolves HTS Plus 4K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46g has the higher overall score (56 vs 50).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.