G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g vs G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g
The short answer
G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g wins this comparison with a score of 51/100, ahead of G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g (50).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g
G-WolvesAt a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g | G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 70 |
| Design | 33 | 30 |
| Connect | 64 | 63 |
| Battery | 4 | 6 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Zowie EC2-CW
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance3▾
| G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g | G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g | |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | — | 32000 DPI |
| Sensor | — | Optical |
| Weight | — | 49 g |
Design1▾
| G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g | G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | — | 5 |
Connect1▾
| G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g | G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
Battery1▾
| G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g | G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 113 h |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, G-Wolves HTS Plus Classic Wireless Gaming Mouse ~46.2g or G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g?
G-Wolves HTS Plus Pro 8K Wireless Gaming Mouse ~28g edges ahead 51 to 50.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.