EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Google Pixel 6

🏆 Settled

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL — Pick the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL — it leads these groups: Display 3 Battery 2 Performance 2

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL wins this comparison with a score of 39/100, ahead of Google Pixel 6 (32).

The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 6.4 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (482 ppi vs 411 ppi).

Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

Google
39score / 100
9 wins · 13 tied PCMag ★ 4.0
Google Pixel 6

Google Pixel 6

Google
32score / 100
4 wins · 18 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Display 44 31
Battery 40 37
Performance 53 40
Camera 42 17
Design 62 66
Platform 8 17
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.4 in vs 6.4 in
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz +30 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Pixel density 482 ppi +71 ppi vs 411 ppi
  • Battery capacity 5115 mAh +501 mAh vs 4614 mAh

Pick the Google Pixel 6 if you care about…

  • Weight 207 g +19 g vs 226 g
  • Length 158.6 mm +4.1 mm vs 162.7 mm
  • Width 74.8 mm +1.7 mm vs 76.5 mm
  • CPU cores 8 +1 vs 7

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

17 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6Where they differ
Screen size 6.8 in6.4 in Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Refresh rate 120 Hz90 Hz Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Pixel density 482 ppi411 ppi Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Display type LTPO OLEDAMOLED Depends
Battery capacity 5115 mAh4614 mAh Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Wireless charging power 25 W21 W Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
RAM 12 GB8 GB Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Chipset Tensor G6Tensor Depends
OS Android 17Android 12 Depends
Storage 256 GB128 GB Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Selfie camera 42 MP8 MP Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Weight 226 g207 g Google Pixel 6
Thickness 8.5 mm8.9 mm Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Length 162.7 mm158.6 mm Google Pixel 6
Width 76.5 mm74.8 mm Google Pixel 6
Colors Canyon, Olive, Fog, ObsidianSorta Seafoam, Kinda Coral, Stormy Black Depends
CPU cores 78 Google Pixel 6

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Screen size 6.8 in 6.4 in
Peak brightness 3600 nits —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Pixel density 482 ppi 411 ppi
Display type LTPO OLED AMOLED
Battery4▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Battery capacity 5115 mAh 4614 mAh
Wired charging 45 W —
Wireless charging power 25 W 21 W
Wireless charging ✓ ✓
Performance5▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
RAM 12 GB 8 GB
Chipset Tensor G6 Tensor
OS Android 17 Android 12
Storage 256 GB 128 GB
AnTuTu 11 score 1933536 —
Camera2▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 42 MP 8 MP
Design6▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Weight 226 g 207 g
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.9 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ ✓
Length 162.7 mm 158.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74.8 mm
Colors Canyon, Olive, Fog, Obsidian Sorta Seafoam, Kinda Coral, Stormy Black
Memory1▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
CPU cores 7 8
Features2▾
Google Pixel 11 Pro XLGoogle Pixel 6
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Google Pixel 11 Pro XL or Google Pixel 6?

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL has the higher overall score (39 vs 32) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Google Pixel 6 instead if Weight matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 6.4 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (482 ppi vs 411 ppi).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.