Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Google Pixel 6A
Google Pixel 6 Pro — Pick the Google Pixel 6 Pro — it leads these groups: Battery 3 Display 2 Camera 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Google Pixel 6 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 35/100, ahead of Google Pixel 6A (28).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Pixel density (512 ppi vs 429 ppi) · Display type (LTPO AMOLED vs OLED).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.7 in +0.6 in vs 6.1 in
- Pixel density 512 ppi +83 ppi vs 429 ppi
- Battery capacity 5003 mAh +593 mAh vs 4410 mAh
- Wired charging 23 W +5 W vs 18 W
Pick the Google Pixel 6A if you care about…
- Weight 178 g +32 g vs 210 g
- Length 152.2 mm +11.7 mm vs 163.9 mm
- Width 71.8 mm +4.1 mm vs 75.9 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.1 in | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 429 ppi | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | OLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 5003 mAh | 4410 mAh | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Wired charging | 23 W | 18 W | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12.2 MP | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Selfie camera | 11.1 MP | 8 MP | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g | Google Pixel 6A |
| Length | 163.9 mm | 152.2 mm | Google Pixel 6A |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 71.8 mm | Google Pixel 6A |
| Colors | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
Battery4▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5003 mAh | 4410 mAh |
| Wired charging | 23 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging power | 23 W | — |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — |
Performance4▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Chipset | Tensor | Tensor |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12.2 MP |
| Selfie camera | 11.1 MP | 8 MP |
Design6▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 163.9 mm | 152.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Colors | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
Memory1▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Google Pixel 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6A | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Google Pixel 6 Pro or Google Pixel 6A?
Google Pixel 6 Pro has the higher overall score (35 vs 28) and leads in Battery, Display, Camera. Choose Google Pixel 6A instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Pixel density (512 ppi vs 429 ppi) · Display type (LTPO AMOLED vs OLED).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.