Google Pixel 6A vs Google Pixel 7
Google Pixel 7 — Pick the Google Pixel 7 — it leads these groups: Battery 2 Camera 2 Performance 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Google Pixel 7 wins this comparison with a score of 29/100, ahead of Google Pixel 6A (25).
The main differences: Screen size (6.1 in vs 6.3 in) · Pixel density (429 ppi vs 416 ppi) · Display type (OLED vs AMOLED).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Google Pixel 6A if you care about…
- Pixel density 429 ppi +13 ppi vs 416 ppi
- Battery capacity 4410 mAh +55 mAh vs 4355 mAh
- Weight 178 g +19 g vs 197 g
- Length 152.2 mm +3.4 mm vs 155.6 mm
Pick the Google Pixel 7 if you care about…
- Screen size 6.3 in +0.2 in vs 6.1 in
- Wired charging 20 W +2 W vs 18 W
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- RAM 8 GB +2 GB vs 6 GB
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
16 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.1 in | 6.3 in | Google Pixel 7 |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 416 ppi | Google Pixel 6A |
| Display type | OLED | AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 4410 mAh | 4355 mAh | Google Pixel 6A |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 20 W | Google Pixel 7 |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Google Pixel 7 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB | Google Pixel 7 |
| Chipset | Tensor | Tensor G2 | Depends |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | Depends |
| Main camera | 12.2 MP | 50 MP | Google Pixel 7 |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 10.8 MP | Google Pixel 7 |
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g | Google Pixel 6A |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.7 mm | Google Pixel 7 |
| Length | 152.2 mm | 155.6 mm | Google Pixel 6A |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 73.2 mm | Google Pixel 6A |
| Colors | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage | Obsidian, Lemongrass, Snow | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.1 in | 6.3 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 1400 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Display type | OLED | AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4410 mAh | 4355 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging power | — | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Tensor | Tensor G2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 12.2 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 10.8 MP |
Design7▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 152.2 mm | 155.6 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Colors | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage | Obsidian, Lemongrass, Snow |
| Body material | — | 玻璃后壳 |
Memory1▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Google Pixel 6A | Google Pixel 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Google Pixel 6A or Google Pixel 7?
Google Pixel 7 has the higher overall score (29 vs 25) and leads in Battery, Camera, Performance. Choose Google Pixel 6A instead if Pixel density matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.1 in vs 6.3 in) · Pixel density (429 ppi vs 416 ppi) · Display type (OLED vs AMOLED).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.