Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7 Pro — Pick the Google Pixel 7 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 3 Battery 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Google Pixel 7 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 31/100, ahead of Google Pixel 7a (30).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (512 ppi vs 429 ppi).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.7 in +0.6 in vs 6.1 in
- Refresh rate 120 Hz +30 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Pixel density 512 ppi +83 ppi vs 429 ppi
- Battery capacity 5000 mAh +615 mAh vs 4385 mAh
Pick the Google Pixel 7a if you care about…
- Main camera 64 MP +14 MP vs 50 MP
- Selfie camera 13 MP +2.2 MP vs 10.8 MP
- Weight 193.5 g +18.5 g vs 212 g
- Length 152 mm +10.9 mm vs 162.9 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.1 in | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 429 ppi | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | OLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 4385 mAh | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Wired charging | 23 W | 18 W | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Wireless charging power | 23 W | 7.5 W | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | Google Pixel 7a |
| Selfie camera | 10.8 MP | 13 MP | Google Pixel 7a |
| Weight | 212 g | 193.5 g | Google Pixel 7a |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9 mm | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Length | 162.9 mm | 152 mm | Google Pixel 7a |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 72.9 mm | Google Pixel 7a |
| Colors | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Peak brightness | 1500 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
Battery4▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 4385 mAh |
| Wired charging | 23 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging power | 23 W | 7.5 W |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Tensor G2 | Tensor G2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Selfie camera | 10.8 MP | 13 MP |
Design6▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 212 g | 193.5 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 162.9 mm | 152 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Colors | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
Memory1▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Google Pixel 7 Pro | Google Pixel 7a | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Google Pixel 7 Pro or Google Pixel 7a?
Google Pixel 7 Pro edges ahead 31 to 30 and leads in Display, Battery. Choose Google Pixel 7a instead if Main camera matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.1 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (512 ppi vs 429 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.