HKC C299Q vs HKC G24H1
The short answer
HKC G24H1 wins this comparison with a score of 61.1/100, ahead of HKC C299Q (60.9).
The main differences: Screen size (29 in vs 23.8 in) · Resolution (2560x1080 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (75 Hz vs 200 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC C299Q | HKC G24H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 41 | 41 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC C299Q if you care about…
- Screen size 29 in +5.2 in vs 23.8 in
Pick the HKC G24H1 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 200 Hz +125 Hz vs 75 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC C299Q | HKC G24H1 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 29 in | 23.8 in | HKC C299Q |
| Resolution | 2560x1080 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 75 Hz | 200 Hz | HKC G24H1 |
| Panel type | VA | Fast-IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HKC C299Q | HKC G24H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 29 in | 23.8 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 75 Hz | 200 Hz |
| Panel type | VA | Fast-IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC C299Q | HKC G24H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 4300 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC C299Q or HKC G24H1?
HKC G24H1 edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose HKC C299Q instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (29 in vs 23.8 in) · Resolution (2560x1080 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (75 Hz vs 200 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.