HKC G24H3S Classic vs HKC G27H2
The short answer
HKC G24H3S Classic wins this comparison with a score of 61.4/100, ahead of HKC G27H2 (61.4).
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1440) · Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC G24H3S Classic | HKC G27H2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 42 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 85 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC G24H3S Classic if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 240 Hz +60 Hz vs 180 Hz
Pick the HKC G27H2 if you care about…
- Screen size 27 in +3.2 in vs 23.8 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC G24H3S Classic | HKC G27H2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 27 in | HKC G27H2 |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1440 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 180 Hz | HKC G24H3S Classic |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HKC G24H3S Classic | HKC G27H2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | Fast-IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC G24H3S Classic | HKC G27H2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 5160 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC G24H3S Classic or HKC G27H2?
HKC G24H3S Classic edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose HKC G27H2 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 2560x1440) · Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.