HKC HKC HK24H1 vs HKC HKC HK27H1
The short answer
HKC HKC HK27H1 wins this comparison with a score of 61.4/100, ahead of HKC HKC HK24H1 (61.2).
The main differences: Screen size (24 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (2560x1440 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC HKC HK24H1 | HKC HKC HK27H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 40 | 42 |
| Ergonomics | 87 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC HKC HK24H1 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 180 Hz +15 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Weight (with stand) 3500 g +1000 g vs 4500 g
Pick the HKC HKC HK27H1 if you care about…
- Screen size 27 in +3 in vs 24 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
5 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC HKC HK24H1 | HKC HKC HK27H1 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 24 in | 27 in | HKC HKC HK27H1 |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz | HKC HKC HK24H1 |
| Panel type | 暂无数据 | IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 3500 g | 4500 g | HKC HKC HK24H1 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HKC HKC HK24H1 | HKC HKC HK27H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 24 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | 暂无数据 | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC HKC HK24H1 | HKC HKC HK27H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3500 g | 4500 g |
Data sources: ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, HKC HKC HK24H1 or HKC HKC HK27H1?
HKC HKC HK27H1 edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose HKC HKC HK24H1 instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (24 in vs 27 in) · Resolution (2560x1440 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U