HKC T3252U vs HKC V2511
The short answer
HKC T3252U wins this comparison with a score of 61.3/100, ahead of HKC V2511 (60.6).
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 24.5 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC T3252U | HKC V2511 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 38 |
| Ergonomics | 86 | 87 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC T3252U if you care about…
- Screen size 31.5 in +7 in vs 24.5 in
Pick the HKC V2511 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 100 Hz +40 Hz vs 60 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC T3252U | HKC V2511 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 24.5 in | HKC T3252U |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz | HKC V2511 |
| Panel type | VA | IPS | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HKC T3252U | HKC V2511 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.5 in | 24.5 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Panel type | VA | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC T3252U | HKC V2511 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | — | 3000 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC T3252U or HKC V2511?
HKC T3252U edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose HKC V2511 instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (31.5 in vs 24.5 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 100 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.