HKC V2511 vs HKC V2719
HKC V2719 — Pick the HKC V2719 — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
HKC V2719 wins this comparison with a score of 57/100, ahead of HKC V2511 (56).
The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 1920*1080) · Max refresh rate (100 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Weight (with stand) (3000 g vs 4250 g).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| HKC V2511 | HKC V2719 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 34 | 38 |
| Ergonomics | 90 | 88 |
How to choose
Pick the HKC V2511 if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 3000 g +1250 g vs 4250 g
Pick the HKC V2719 if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 144 Hz +44 Hz vs 100 Hz
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HKC V2511 | HKC V2719 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920*1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 100 Hz | 144 Hz | HKC V2719 |
| Weight (with stand) | 3000 g | 4250 g | HKC V2511 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| HKC V2511 | HKC V2719 | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920*1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 100 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| HKC V2511 | HKC V2719 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3000 g | 4250 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HKC V2511 or HKC V2719?
HKC V2719 edges ahead 57 to 56 and leads in Display. Choose HKC V2511 instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (1920x1080 vs 1920*1080) · Max refresh rate (100 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Weight (with stand) (3000 g vs 4250 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.