Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro vs HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII
The short answer
Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro wins this comparison with a score of 78/100, ahead of HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII (68).
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 96 | 56 |
| Features | 100 | 100 |
| Battery | 56 | 48 |
| Audio | 57 | 59 |
| Connectivity | 86 | 84 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM5
Sony WH-1000XM4
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless
JBL Live 770NC
JBL Tour One M2
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design3▾
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Sweat/water resistance | ✓ | — |
| Foldable design | ✓ | — |
Features2▾
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellation | ✓ | — |
| Built-in microphone | ✓ | — |
Battery2▾
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 80 h | — |
| Charge time | 2 h | — |
Audio5▾
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver unit | 40 mm | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20000 Hz | — |
| LDAC | ✓ | — |
Connectivity3▾
| Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro | HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Multipoint connection | ✓ | — |
| USB-C charging | ✓ | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro or HyperX 3D Headset Plate Civilization VII?
Honor Choice VZ Sport Mate Pro has the higher overall score (78 vs 68).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 15 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 15 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.