Honor Magic9 Pro Max vs Honor Magic9 Super
Honor Magic9 Super — Pick the Honor Magic9 Super — it leads these groups: Design 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Honor Magic9 Super wins this comparison with a score of 56/100, ahead of Honor Magic9 Pro Max (53).
The main differences: Pixel density (464 ppi vs 450 ppi) · Display type (LTPO OLED vs OLED) · Battery capacity (8800 mAh vs 11000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Honor Magic9 Pro Max if you care about…
- Pixel density 464 ppi +14 ppi vs 450 ppi
- Wired charging 100 W +20 W vs 80 W
- Wireless charging power 80 W +30 W vs 50 W
- Selfie camera 55 MP +5 MP vs 50 MP
Pick the Honor Magic9 Super if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
- Battery capacity 11000 mAh +2200 mAh vs 8800 mAh
- Weight 227 g +6 g vs 233 g
- Thickness 8.1 mm +0.5 mm vs 8.6 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 450 ppi | Honor Magic9 Pro Max |
| Display type | LTPO OLED | OLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 8800 mAh | 11000 mAh | Honor Magic9 Super |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W | Honor Magic9 Pro Max |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 50 W | Honor Magic9 Pro Max |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Depends |
| Selfie camera | 55 MP | 50 MP | Honor Magic9 Pro Max |
| Weight | 233 g | 227 g | Honor Magic9 Super |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.1 mm | Honor Magic9 Super |
| Length | 161.6 mm | 161.8 mm | Honor Magic9 Pro Max |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.7 mm | Honor Magic9 Super |
| Colors | Shadow Black, Glacier Silver, Moss Green | Black, White, Green, Yellow | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 10000 nits | 10000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Display type | LTPO OLED | OLED |
Battery4▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 8800 mAh | 11000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 50 W |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Selfie camera | 55 MP | 50 MP |
Design6▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 233 g | 227 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 161.6 mm | 161.8 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Colors | Shadow Black, Glacier Silver, Moss Green | Black, White, Green, Yellow |
Memory1▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Honor Magic9 Pro Max | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Honor Magic9 Pro Max or Honor Magic9 Super?
Honor Magic9 Super has the higher overall score (56 vs 53) and leads in Design. Choose Honor Magic9 Pro Max instead if Pixel density matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Pixel density (464 ppi vs 450 ppi) · Display type (LTPO OLED vs OLED) · Battery capacity (8800 mAh vs 11000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
vivo X Fold6
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold