EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Honor Magic9 Pro Max vs Honor Magic9 Super

🏆 Settled

Honor Magic9 Super — Pick the Honor Magic9 Super — it leads these groups: Design 3

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Honor Magic9 Super wins this comparison with a score of 56/100, ahead of Honor Magic9 Pro Max (53).

The main differences: Pixel density (464 ppi vs 450 ppi) · Display type (LTPO OLED vs OLED) · Battery capacity (8800 mAh vs 11000 mAh).

Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Honor Magic9 Pro Max

Honor Magic9 Pro Max

Honor
53score / 100
5 wins · 16 tied
🏆 Overall winner Honor Magic9 Super

Honor Magic9 Super

Honor
56score / 100
5 wins · 16 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Display 53 53
Battery 72 74
Performance 55 71
Camera 100 96
Design 66 68
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Honor Magic9 Pro Max if you care about…

  • Pixel density 464 ppi +14 ppi vs 450 ppi
  • Wired charging 100 W +20 W vs 80 W
  • Wireless charging power 80 W +30 W vs 50 W
  • Selfie camera 55 MP +5 MP vs 50 MP

Pick the Honor Magic9 Super if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.0 in vs 6.8 in
  • Battery capacity 11000 mAh +2200 mAh vs 8800 mAh
  • Weight 227 g +6 g vs 233 g
  • Thickness 8.1 mm +0.5 mm vs 8.6 mm

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 SuperWhere they differ
Pixel density 464 ppi450 ppi Honor Magic9 Pro Max
Display type LTPO OLEDOLED Depends
Battery capacity 8800 mAh11000 mAh Honor Magic9 Super
Wired charging 100 W80 W Honor Magic9 Pro Max
Wireless charging power 80 W50 W Honor Magic9 Pro Max
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Depends
Selfie camera 55 MP50 MP Honor Magic9 Pro Max
Weight 233 g227 g Honor Magic9 Super
Thickness 8.6 mm8.1 mm Honor Magic9 Super
Length 161.6 mm161.8 mm Honor Magic9 Pro Max
Width 77 mm76.7 mm Honor Magic9 Super
Colors Shadow Black, Glacier Silver, Moss GreenBlack, White, Green, Yellow Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Screen size 6.8 in 6.8 in
Peak brightness 10000 nits 10000 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Pixel density 464 ppi 450 ppi
Display type LTPO OLED OLED
Battery4▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Battery capacity 8800 mAh 11000 mAh
Wired charging 100 W 80 W
Wireless charging power 80 W 50 W
Wireless charging ✓ ✓
Performance4▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
RAM 12 GB 12 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
OS Android 17 Android 17
Storage 256 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Selfie camera 55 MP 50 MP
Design6▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Weight 233 g 227 g
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ ✓
Length 161.6 mm 161.8 mm
Width 77 mm 76.7 mm
Colors Shadow Black, Glacier Silver, Moss Green Black, White, Green, Yellow
Memory1▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Honor Magic9 Pro MaxHonor Magic9 Super
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Honor Magic9 Pro Max or Honor Magic9 Super?

Honor Magic9 Super has the higher overall score (56 vs 53) and leads in Design. Choose Honor Magic9 Pro Max instead if Pixel density matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Pixel density (464 ppi vs 450 ppi) · Display type (LTPO OLED vs OLED) · Battery capacity (8800 mAh vs 11000 mAh).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.