HTC Vive Pro 2 vs HTC Vive Pro Eye
HTC Vive Pro 2 — Pick the HTC Vive Pro 2 — it leads these groups: Display 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
HTC Vive Pro 2 wins this comparison with a score of 43/100, ahead of HTC Vive Pro Eye (39).
The main differences: Resolution (4896 x 2448 px vs 2880 x 1600 px) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Field of view (120 ° vs 110 °).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the HTC Vive Pro 2 if you care about…
- Refresh rate 120 Hz +30 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Field of view 120 ° +10 ° vs 110 °
Pick the HTC Vive Pro Eye if you care about…
- Weight 555 g +295 g vs 850 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
HTC Vive Pro
HTC Vive
HP Reverb G2
HTC Vive Cosmos
Google Daydream View
Apple Vision Pro
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| HTC Vive Pro 2 | HTC Vive Pro Eye | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 4896 x 2448 px | 2880 x 1600 px | Depends |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | HTC Vive Pro 2 |
| Field of view | 120 ° | 110 ° | HTC Vive Pro 2 |
| Weight | 850 g | 555 g | HTC Vive Pro Eye |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| HTC Vive Pro 2 | HTC Vive Pro Eye | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 4896 x 2448 px | 2880 x 1600 px |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 120 ° | 110 ° |
| Pixel density | 950 ppi | — |
Design1▾
| HTC Vive Pro 2 | HTC Vive Pro Eye | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 850 g | 555 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, HTC Vive Pro 2 or HTC Vive Pro Eye?
HTC Vive Pro 2 has the higher overall score (43 vs 39) and leads in Display. Choose HTC Vive Pro Eye instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (4896 x 2448 px vs 2880 x 1600 px) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Field of view (120 ° vs 110 °).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.