IQAir Atem X vs JHQ-801 JHQ-801
The short answer
IQAir Atem X wins this comparison with a score of 79/100, ahead of JHQ-801 JHQ-801 (76).
The main differences: Power (110 W vs 2 W).
Scores are computed from 2 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| IQAir Atem X | JHQ-801 JHQ-801 | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise | 67 | 57 |
| Efficiency | 95 | 100 |
How to choose
Pick the JHQ-801 JHQ-801 if you care about…
- Power 2 W +108 W vs 110 W
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| IQAir Atem X | JHQ-801 JHQ-801 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 110 W | 2 W | JHQ-801 JHQ-801 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Noise1▾
| IQAir Atem X | JHQ-801 JHQ-801 | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise level | 30 dB | — |
Efficiency1▾
| IQAir Atem X | JHQ-801 JHQ-801 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 110 W | 2 W |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, IQAir Atem X or JHQ-801 JHQ-801?
IQAir Atem X has the higher overall score (79 vs 76). Choose JHQ-801 JHQ-801 instead if Power matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Power (110 W vs 2 W).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 2 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier4Pro
Xiaomi Xiaomi Air Purifier5S
airpal VB110 V-B110
KJ100G-A01 KJ100G-A01
LEXY AP33
Xiaomi 3 Max CJSJSQ01ZM