NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America vs MD Johns Hopkins University
MD Johns Hopkins University — Pick the MD Johns Hopkins University — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
MD Johns Hopkins University wins this comparison with a score of 51/100, ahead of NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America (45).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (48.6 % vs 6.4 %) · Average SAT (1500 vs 1553) · In-state tuition (67357 USD/yr vs 65230 USD/yr).
Scores are computed from 16 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 74 | 55 |
| Cost & outcomes | 43 | 44 |
| Rankings | 48 | 84 |
| Students & campus | 0 | 3 |
How to choose
Pick the NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 48.6 % +42.2 % vs 6.4 %
- Median earnings (10 yr) 92751 USD +5196 USD vs 87555 USD
Pick the MD Johns Hopkins University if you care about…
- Average SAT 1553 +53 vs 1500
- In-state tuition 65230 USD/yr +2127 USD/yr vs 67357 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 65230 USD/yr +2127 USD/yr vs 67357 USD/yr
- Graduation rate (150%) 93.8 % +3.5 % vs 90.3 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
8 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 48.6 % | 6.4 % | NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America |
| Average SAT | 1500 | 1553 | MD Johns Hopkins University |
| In-state tuition | 67357 USD/yr | 65230 USD/yr | MD Johns Hopkins University |
| Out-of-state tuition | 67357 USD/yr | 65230 USD/yr | MD Johns Hopkins University |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 92751 USD | 87555 USD | NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 90.3 % | 93.8 % | MD Johns Hopkins University |
| Freshman retention | 95.7 % | 98.1 % | MD Johns Hopkins University |
| Undergraduate students | 172 | 5693 | MD Johns Hopkins University |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 48.6 % | 6.4 % |
| Average SAT | 1500 | 1553 |
| Average ACT | 33 | — |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 67357 USD/yr | 65230 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 67357 USD/yr | 65230 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 92751 USD | 87555 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | — | 89.7 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 90.3 % | 93.8 % |
| Freshman retention | 95.7 % | 98.1 % |
Rankings4▾
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | |
|---|---|---|
| THE world rank | — | 16 |
| THE overall score | — | 90.1 |
| THE teaching | — | 84.6 |
| THE research | — | 89.9 |
Students & campus3▾
| NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America | MD Johns Hopkins University | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 172 | 5693 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Private nonprofit | Private nonprofit |
Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education
FAQ
Which is better, NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America or MD Johns Hopkins University?
MD Johns Hopkins University has the higher overall score (51 vs 45) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Students & campus. Choose NY Jewish Theological Seminary of America instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (48.6 % vs 6.4 %) · Average SAT (1500 vs 1553) · In-state tuition (67357 USD/yr vs 65230 USD/yr).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 16 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.