EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻 vs MCHOSE K99 V3 /

🏆 Settled

MCHOSE K99 V3 / — Pick the MCHOSE K99 V3 / — it leads these groups: Design 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

MCHOSE K99 V3 / wins this comparison with a score of 68.9/100, ahead of 膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻 (68.8).

The main differences: Key count (82 vs 98).

Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻

膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻

膜爪K820
69score / 100
0 wins · 2 tied
🏆 Overall winner MCHOSE K99 V3 /

MCHOSE K99 V3 /

MCHOSE
69score / 100
1 win · 1 tie ZOL Users ★ 0.0

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻MCHOSE K99 V3 /
Design 68 68
Connect 87 87

How to choose

Pick the MCHOSE K99 V3 / if you care about…

  • Key count 98 +16 vs 82

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻MCHOSE K99 V3 /Where they differ
Key count 8298 MCHOSE K99 V3 /

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design2▾
膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻MCHOSE K99 V3 /
Layout 75%配列 —
Key count 82 98
Connect1▾
膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻MCHOSE K99 V3 /
2.4GHz wireless ✓ ✓
Feel1▾
膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻MCHOSE K99 V3 /
Switch type 茶轴 —

Data sources: GSMArena · ZOL

FAQ

Which is better, 膜爪K820 膜爪K820 茶轴 雾蓝正刻 or MCHOSE K99 V3 /?

MCHOSE K99 V3 / edges ahead 69 to 69 and leads in Design.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Key count (82 vs 98).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.