EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse vs Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse

The short answer

Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse wins this comparison with a score of 58/100, ahead of Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse (56).

The main differences: Key count (100 vs 6).

Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse

Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse

Keychron
56score / 100
1 win · 3 tied
🏆 Overall winner Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse

Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse

Keychron
58score / 100
0 wins · 4 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Keychron M4 Wireless MouseKeychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse
Design 24 37
Connect 66 66

How to choose

Pick the Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse if you care about…

  • Key count 100 +94 vs 6

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Keychron M4 Wireless MouseKeychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic MouseWhere they differ
Key count 1006 Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Design4▾
Keychron M4 Wireless MouseKeychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse
Layout QWERTY —
Hot-swappable — —
Per-key RGB — —
Key count 100 6
Connect1▾
Keychron M4 Wireless MouseKeychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse
Wired ✓ ✓
Feel1▾
Keychron M4 Wireless MouseKeychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse
Switch type Linear —

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse or Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse?

Keychron M5 Wireless Ergonomic Mouse edges ahead 58 to 56. Choose Keychron M4 Wireless Mouse instead if Key count matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Key count (100 vs 6).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.