Lenovo Explorer vs Lenovo Mirage Solo
The short answer
Lenovo Mirage Solo wins this comparison with a score of 48/100, ahead of Lenovo Explorer (46).
The main differences: Resolution (2880 x 1440 px vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Refresh rate (90 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Weight (380 g vs 645 g).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 54 | 41 |
| Battery | 47 | 56 |
| Design | 64 | 28 |
| Connectivity | 0 | 83 |
How to choose
Pick the Lenovo Explorer if you care about…
- Refresh rate 90 Hz +15 Hz vs 75 Hz
- Weight 380 g +265 g vs 645 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
HTC Vive Pro 2
HTC Vive Pro
HTC Vive
HP Reverb G2
HTC Vive Cosmos
Google Daydream View
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2880 x 1440 px | 2560 x 1440 px | Depends |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 75 Hz | Lenovo Explorer |
| Weight | 380 g | 645 g | Lenovo Explorer |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2880 x 1440 px | 2560 x 1440 px |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 ° | 110 ° |
Battery1▾
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | — | 4000 mAh |
Design1▾
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 380 g | 645 g |
Connectivity1▾
| Lenovo Explorer | Lenovo Mirage Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Lenovo Explorer or Lenovo Mirage Solo?
Lenovo Mirage Solo edges ahead 48 to 46. Choose Lenovo Explorer instead if Refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2880 x 1440 px vs 2560 x 1440 px) · Refresh rate (90 Hz vs 75 Hz) · Weight (380 g vs 645 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.