LG LG 31MU97 vs LG LG 34UM67
The short answer
LG LG 31MU97 wins this comparison with a score of 62.0/100, ahead of LG LG 34UM67 (61.9).
The main differences: Screen size (31 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (4096x2160 vs 2560x1080).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| LG LG 31MU97 | LG LG 34UM67 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 44 | 44 |
How to choose
Pick the LG LG 34UM67 if you care about…
- Screen size 34 in +3 in vs 31 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| LG LG 31MU97 | LG LG 34UM67 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31 in | 34 in | LG LG 34UM67 |
| Resolution | 4096x2160 | 2560x1080 | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| LG LG 31MU97 | LG LG 34UM67 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31 in | 34 in |
| Resolution | 4096x2160 | 2560x1080 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Data sources: ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, LG LG 31MU97 or LG LG 34UM67?
LG LG 31MU97 edges ahead 62 to 62. Choose LG LG 34UM67 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (31 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (4096x2160 vs 2560x1080).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.