G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse vs Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition
The short answer
G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse wins this comparison with a score of 56/100, ahead of Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition (50).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition
LogitechAt a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse | Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 61 | 63 |
| Design | 82 | 33 |
| Connect | 63 | 64 |
| Battery | 8 | 4 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance1▾
| G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse | Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | Optical | — |
Design1▾
| G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse | Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | 13 | — |
Connect1▾
| G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse | Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | ✓ | — |
Battery1▾
| G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse | Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 140 h | — |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse or Logitech G640 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad, performance addition?
G502 X LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse has the higher overall score (56 vs 50).
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Zowie EC2-CW
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S