EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse vs G740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad

The short answer

Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse wins this comparison with a score of 53/100, ahead of G740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad (50).

Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse

Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse

Logitech
53score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied
G740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad

G740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad

Logitech
50score / 100
0 wins · 5 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming MouseG740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad
Performance 75 63
Design 33 33
Connect 68 64
Battery 2 4

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance3▾
Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming MouseG740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad
Max DPI 25600 DPI —
Sensor Optical —
Weight 10 g —
Design1▾
Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming MouseG740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad
Buttons 6 —
Connect1▾
Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming MouseG740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad
Wired — —
Battery1▾
Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming MouseG740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad
Battery life 35 h —

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse or G740 Large Cloth Gaming Mouse Pad?

Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Mouse has the higher overall score (53 vs 50).

What are the main differences?

Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.