EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging Dock vs Logitech MX Master 3S

The short answer

Logitech MX Master 3S wins this comparison with a score of 58/100, ahead of Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging Dock (50).

Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging Dock

Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging Dock

Logitech
50score / 100
0 wins · 9 tied
🏆 Overall winner Logitech MX Master 3S

Logitech MX Master 3S

Logitech
58score / 100
0 wins · 9 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Performance 63 11
Design 33 22
Connect 64 68
Battery 4 100
Value 71 86

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance3▾
Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Max DPI — 8000 DPI
Sensor — Logitech Darkfield
Weight — 141 g
Design2▾
Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Buttons — 7
RGB lighting — —
Connect3▾
Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Wired — —
Bluetooth — ✓
2.4GHz wireless — ✓
Battery1▾
Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Battery life — 1776 h
Value1▾
Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging DockLogitech MX Master 3S
Price — 100 USD

FAQ

Which is better, Buy MX Ink MR Stylus + Charging Dock or Logitech MX Master 3S?

Logitech MX Master 3S has the higher overall score (58 vs 50).

What are the main differences?

Scores are computed from 10 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 10 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.