EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse vs MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac

The short answer

It's a close call: MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse / MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac both land at 51/100.

Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse

MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse

Logitech
51score / 100
0 wins · 3 tied
MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac

MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac

Logitech
51score / 100
0 wins · 3 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

MX Master 3S Business Wireless MouseMX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac
Performance 61 61
Design 41 41
Connect 68 68
Battery 4 4

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance1▾
MX Master 3S Business Wireless MouseMX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac
Sensor Optical Optical
Design1▾
MX Master 3S Business Wireless MouseMX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac
Buttons 7 7
Connect1▾
MX Master 3S Business Wireless MouseMX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac
Wired — —
Battery1▾
MX Master 3S Business Wireless MouseMX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac
Battery life 70 h 70 h

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse or MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac?

It's a close call: MX Master 3S Business Wireless Mouse / MX Master 3S Wireless Bluetooth Mouse for Mac both land at 51/100.

What are the main differences?

Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.